Carbon Black Cb Response vs Fidelis Elevate

Carbon Black Cb Response is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 3 reviews vs Fidelis Elevate which is ranked 9th in Endpoint Detection and Response with 1 review. The top reviewer of Carbon Black Cb Response writes "Enhanced logging allowed us to quickly identify/resolve security issues". The top reviewer of Fidelis Elevate writes "Quick search improves our hunt ability, but interface bug causes unscheduled reboots". Carbon Black Cb Response is most compared with Carbon Black Cb Defense, Fidelis Elevate and SECDO Platform . Fidelis Elevate is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, IBM Resilient and Carbon Black Cb Response.

Carbon Black Cb Response

Fidelis Elevate

31760

Carbon Black Cb Response

Based on 3 reviews.

19029

Fidelis Elevate

Based on 1 review.

Most Helpful Review

Consultic624

Consulting IT Architect

Excels at providing context to indicators when responding to incidents

Carbon Black Cb Response significantly reduced time to containment in the environment which enabled the isolation of incidents to single hosts or... Read more »

ITSecuri7cfd

IT Security Coordinator at a healthcare company

Quick search improves our hunt ability, but interface bug causes unscheduled reboots

Increased our ability to stop malware before it hits workstations. That ability increased by 200% due to the number of ports it monitors, over the... Read more »

Have A Question About Security Incident Response?

Our experts can help. 291,145 professionals have used our research on 6,533 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing Carbon Black Cb Response vs Fidelis Elevate

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Carbon Black Cb Response excels at providing context to indicators when responding to incidents. It allows responders to understand the entire scope of an incident and quickly contain it to minimize impact and disruption.The enhanced logging and data analysis of the incident response and investigation components allowed us to quickly identify and resolve security issues before they could spread.The ability to quickly isolate a system from the network, while still being able to perform some forensics and mitigation work remotely, was of great value to us since we had many mobile and distributed systems.We also took full advantage of its incident response reporting capabilities to act as a “black box” for our infrastructure around strings of suspicious activity. The reporting and incident response capabilities were incredibly helpful during active security concerns.For setup, the server can be given to you as a VM image and with minimal configuration needed.We are able to remotely isolate exploited endpoints in seconds and perform a live deep dive of any endpoint into its running processes (as necessary) without the need for extra scripts.The ability to isolate an endpoint with only the host name and a click of a button is a major time saver. Read more »	It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM.It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies.Reporting is great, it is easy to do a quick search through 45 days of data for something of interest.After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours. Read more »
Cons
The solution needs to simplify the process of adding custom watchlists, as well as embrace YARA for rule creation.Setup is incredibly complex and poorly documented. Every time an upgrade was needed we would need to engage Professional Services for troubleshooting help. Certificates and web services proved to be the most significant sticking points. Since the product runs on a Linux platform, perhaps having staff with more Linux experience could have alleviated some difficulty.The biggest issue I encountered was one where old logs were not being overwritten as expected so the system drive kept filling up from time to time. However, support was usually quite responsive and happy to jump on a remote session to take a look at it for us. That log bug has probably been resolved with an update by now.The threat intelligence feed could use some fine tweaking.We are subscribed to FS-ISAC threat indicator, but have been unsuccessful in adding it to our alliance feeds. Read more »	The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice

Purchase Professional Services up front as part of the implementation package, then renew hours annually to ensure you have adequate support for upgrades and enhancements. Overbuy by at least 10% to account for infrastructure growth.We had no issues purchasing through our preferred reseller and were able to get a fair price even when not purchasing direct. Carbon Black Enterprise Response didn’t break the bank, though adding on the matching antivirus and anti-malware components of the Protect product was more than we could afford, even with some discounting. Cb Response is really designed to complement Carbon Black’s Defense product. While Response can be used on its own, coupling with Defense seems like the best strategy if you can afford the price tag.

You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base.

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING	2nd out of 21 In Security Incident Response Views 443 Comparisons 280 Reviews 3 Followers 27 Avg. Rating 8.7	9th out of 15 In Endpoint Detection and Response Views 637 Comparisons 316 Reviews 1 Followers 113 Avg. Rating 6.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Carbon Black Cb Defense vs. Carbon Black Cb Response Compared 64% of the time. Fidelis Elevate vs. Carbon Black Cb Response Compared 13% of the time. SECDO Platform vs. Carbon Black Cb Response Compared 9% of the time. See more Carbon Black Cb Response competitors »	Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs. Fidelis Elevate Compared 23% of the time. IBM Resilient vs. Fidelis Elevate Compared 16% of the time. Carbon Black Cb Response vs. Fidelis Elevate Compared 13% of the time. See more Fidelis Elevate competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As		Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud
Website/Video
Website/Video	Carbon Black	Fidelis Cybersecurity
Overview
Overview	Cb Response is an industry-leading incident response and threat hunting solution designed for security operations center (SOC) teams. Cb Response continuously records and captures unfiltered endpoint data, so that security professionals can hunt threats in real time and visualize the complete attack kill chain. It leverages the Cb Predictive Security Cloud's aggregated threat intelligence, continuously comparing intel to current and historical endpoint activity, exposing undetected threats.	Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.
OFFER
Learn more about Carbon Black Cb Response Learn More	Learn more about Fidelis Elevate Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Information Not Available	First Midwest Bank

Have A Question About Security Incident Response?

Our experts can help. 291,145 professionals have used our research on 6,533 solutions.

We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.