We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and VMware Carbon Black Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"Carbon Black insures the probability that any ransomware will be stopped before spreading."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Carbon Black Cloud is the possibility of securing any PC worldwide."
"The detection response and quarantining are very good features."
"We also took full advantage of its incident response reporting capabilities to act as a “black box” for our infrastructure around strings of suspicious activity. The reporting and incident response capabilities were incredibly helpful during active security concerns."
"The most valuable features are its lightweight design, ensuring minimal impact on end-users, and its real-time protection."
"For setup, the server can be given to you as a VM image and with minimal configuration needed."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to seek out abnormal activity and to create alerts."
"The most valuable features are the threat-hunting and the batch console."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"It's not highly available, so you have to have a core server. If the primary server goes down, you need a new one. It's not available at the same time, however. It's not automatically swapped from one server to another."
"The cloud console has a lot of bugs and issues in the analysis part."
"It's not simple."
"The biggest issue I encountered was one where old logs were not being overwritten as expected so the system drive kept filling up from time to time. However, support was usually quite responsive and happy to jump on a remote session to take a look at it for us. That log bug has probably been resolved with an update by now."
"Additionally, it is complex to use, and the pricing should be improved."
"The solution needs to simplify the process of adding custom watchlists, as well as embrace YARA for rule creation."
"Setup is incredibly complex and poorly documented. Every time an upgrade was needed we would need to engage Professional Services for troubleshooting help. Certificates and web services proved to be the most significant sticking points. Since the product runs on a Linux platform, perhaps having staff with more Linux experience could have alleviated some difficulty."
"The solution's support could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 18 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Cloud writes " Shows promise for endpoint detection and response, with room for improvement in complexity and pricing ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas VMware Carbon Black Cloud is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Fidelis Elevate, Splunk SOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.