We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and VMware Carbon Black Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response."The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."
"The ability to quickly isolate a system from the network, while still being able to perform some forensics and mitigation work remotely, was of great value to us since we had many mobile and distributed systems."
"The solution does very well as a baseline EDR and provides good process-level management."
"We also took full advantage of its incident response reporting capabilities to act as a “black box” for our infrastructure around strings of suspicious activity. The reporting and incident response capabilities were incredibly helpful during active security concerns."
"The ability to isolate an endpoint with only the host name and a click of a button is a major time saver."
"The detection response and quarantining are very good features."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Carbon Black Cloud is the possibility of securing any PC worldwide."
"VMware Carbon Black Cloud is a user-friendly solution that can isolate machines from the rest of the network."
"The market information they gather from the community is really good. Their configuration capabilities are good."
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."
"The solution needs to simplify the process of adding custom watchlists, as well as embrace YARA for rule creation."
"One area for improvement is the maturity of its vulnerability features."
"They have different products, but if we wanted to take their protection and their EPR, then we would need to have two agents"
"It's not simple."
"Setup is incredibly complex and poorly documented. Every time an upgrade was needed we would need to engage Professional Services for troubleshooting help. Certificates and web services proved to be the most significant sticking points. Since the product runs on a Linux platform, perhaps having staff with more Linux experience could have alleviated some difficulty."
"They need to improve the batch console. It needs more capabilities. We are limited by the ones it provides..."
"The solution can only handle about 500 bans or blocks."
"Technical support for the solution should be improved because there is a scarcity of support teams in the Middle East."
Earn 20 points
Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 18 reviews. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while VMware Carbon Black Cloud is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Cloud writes " Shows promise for endpoint detection and response, with room for improvement in complexity and pricing ". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas VMware Carbon Black Cloud is most compared with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, Fidelis Elevate, Splunk SOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
