CaseCentral eDiscovery Platform [EOL] vs OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    18th
    out of 40 in eDiscovery
    Views
    209
    Comparisons
    114
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    eDiscovery Platform
    Catalyst e-Discovery
    Learn More
    CaseCentral
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Major CERCLA lawsuit

    CaseCentral eDiscovery Platform [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 18th in eDiscovery. CaseCentral eDiscovery Platform [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CaseCentral eDiscovery Platform [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with Actiance.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.