Caspio vs Google App Engine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Caspio Logo
583 views|450 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Google Logo
3,912 views|3,354 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Caspio and Google App Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Caspio was user-friendly compared to other solutions. As someone who doesn't know a lot about coding, I found it easy to create a web application on this platform."

More Caspio Pros →

"Its ability to integrate with most devices helps users who have different or old devices.""Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications.""The initial setup is okay. It's not too complex. Deployment took about one day.""It is simple to use. It is much simpler than AWS. It is also very powerful.""The solution is serverless, so we don't have to operate it.""I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time.""Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine.""The product's setup and deployment phases are easy."

More Google App Engine Pros →

Cons
"The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of customizing on that part. They could add some templates that are more attractive than the basic ones. It would be helpful if you could start with something that's already built rather than working on standard templates from scratch."

More Caspio Cons →

"I would like a simpler deployment tool on laptops. It is a bit complicated at the moment. We know how to do it, but it could be easier to deploy it on laptops.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The only concern is that there is a number of the offerings which are built on their own proprietary technologies. With some of the offerings in Google Cloud, it's difficult to have a path to migrate to other cloud providers.""The documentation and community are lacking for this product.""I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five.""The support for the Indian region is not as good as compared to the support that is offered to the regions in Europe.""Difficult to assess how pricing is managed.""I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it."

More Google App Engine Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."
  • "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
  • "If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
  • More Google App Engine Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for alluring IT customers. This article give brief history of these cloud hosting service providers and compares the cloud services provided by them. -- Amazon Web Services -- It's hard to find someone who doesn't agree that Amazon Web Services is the market leader in IaaS cloud computing. The company has one of the widest breadths of cloud services - including compute, storage, networking, databases, load balancers, applications and application development platforms all delivered as a cloud service. Amazon has dropped its prices 21 times since it debuted its cloud six years ago and fairly consistently fills whatever gaps it has in the size of virtual machine instances on its platform - the company recently rolled out new high-memory instances, for example. There are some cautions for Amazon though. Namely, its cloud has experienced three major outages in two years. One analyst, Jillian Mirandi of Technology Business Researcher, has suggested that continued outages could eventually start hindering businesses' willingness to invest in Amazon infrastructure. That sentiment gets to a larger point about AWS though - the service seems to be popular in the startup community, providing the IT… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Caspio was user-friendly compared to other solutions. As someone who doesn't know a lot about coding, I found it easy to create a web application on this platform.
    Top Answer:The visualization of the data pages could be improved. You have to a lot of tweaking to make the visualization stand out. It's basic, but there are a lot of options. So you really have to do a lot of… more »
    Top Answer:I did a demo of Caspio to see if I could recreate a web application by importing a CSC file.
    Top Answer:The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.
    Top Answer:If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price. It will increase a lot of our bill. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Ranking
    Views
    583
    Comparisons
    450
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    3,912
    Comparisons
    3,354
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    514
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Caspio is the world’s leading NO-CODE platform for building custom business applications without coding. Scale up with UNLIMITED app builders and users at no extra cost.

    Caspio provides an intuitive visual application builder that guides you through every aspect of creating sophisticated cloud applications. Create custom web forms, searchable databases, multi-user portals, interactive dashboards, automated workflows and much more — in a fraction of the time compared to traditional development.

    By empowering business professionals to create their own applications, Caspio sets a new standard for doing more with less. Align your frontline customer-facing teams, business operations and IT departments like never before. Automate processes, eliminate data silos and enable digital transformation with less strain on backlogged IT departments.

    With Caspio's low-code approach, launch custom applications fast and drive continuous improvement across the business — all using clicks, not code.

    Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

    Sample Customers
    Florida Department of Health, AdvanceKentucky, Japan Center for International Exchange (JCIE), Philips, Comcast, Coca Cola, HP, Whirlpool, Verizon, Lenovo, Yale University
    Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Insurance Company14%
    Educational Organization11%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Media Company25%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Non Profit13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Caspio is ranked 23rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review while Google App Engine is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 23 reviews. Caspio is rated 8.0, while Google App Engine is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Caspio writes "It's a good solution for those with limited coding experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google App Engine writes "Simplifies app development process for businesses". Caspio is most compared with Zoho Creator, Microsoft Power Apps, Knack and Oracle Application Express (APEX), whereas Google App Engine is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Heroku, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Google Compute Engine.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.