We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cassandra Logo
2,807 views|2,325 comparisons
InfluxDB Logo
2,149 views|1,666 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The technical evaluation is very good.""The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level.""The solution's database capabilities are very good.""The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing.""Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."

More Cassandra Pros »

"The solution is very powerful.""The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

More InfluxDB Pros »

Cons
"Interface is not user friendly.""Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge.""The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working.""The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that.""The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."

More Cassandra Cons »

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface.""The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

More InfluxDB Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover.
Top Answer: This was for an enterprise company and they are expensive. Cassandra has a heavy pricing mechanism because it's a yearly license. I'm pretty sure we were paying something around $50,000 annually at… more »
Top Answer: The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions.
Top Answer: The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring.
Top Answer: The initial setup is a little bit complex. The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative.
Top Answer: We don't use a managed service. Rather, we manage it ourselves. We have deployed it and right now, we are using it for log aggregation with a two-week retention policy.
Ranking
3rd
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
2,807
Comparisons
2,325
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
430
Rating
8.4
4th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
2,149
Comparisons
1,666
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
392
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
A scalable multi-master database with no single points of failure. Scalability & high availability without compromising performance.

InfluxData delivers a modern open source platform built from the ground up for metrics and events (time-sensitive data). Build monitoring, analytics, and IoT applications faster, easier, and to scale.

This technically is know as time-series data. With InfluxData you can build monitoring, analytics, and IoT applications faster, easier, and to scale. Today, there are different general purpose ways to handle time-based data. But they slow you down with dependencies and complexities or fail to scale. InfluxData is the only purpose-built complete platform for any time-based data — from humans, sensors, or machines — seamlessly collecting, storing, visualizing, and turning insight into action. With both fast deployment and fast performance, InfluxData delivers real value in real time.

Offer
Learn more about Cassandra
Learn more about InfluxDB
Sample Customers
Apple, BazaarVoice, Best Buy, eBay, Netflix
ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider21%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company17%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business43%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cassandra is ranked 3rd in NoSQL Databases with 5 reviews while InfluxDB is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.4, while InfluxDB is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Great time series data feature but it requires third parties to join tables". On the other hand, the top reviewer of InfluxDB writes "Good log aggregation features and integration with Grafana". Cassandra is most compared with Accumulo, Couchbase, Apache HBase, Vertica and Oracle NoSQL, whereas InfluxDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Apache HBase, Scylla and SingleStore DB. See our Cassandra vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.