Cassandra vs Neo4j Graph Database comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,588 views|2,814 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Neo4j Logo
1,142 views|743 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover.""The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing.""The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level.""The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature.""A consistent solution.""The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming.""The technical evaluation is very good.""The solution's database capabilities are very good."

More Cassandra Pros →

"Creates the ability to visualize outputs.""Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps.""As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."

More Neo4j Graph Database Pros →

Cons
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working.""Interface is not user friendly.""Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product.""Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit.""The solution is limited to a linear performance.""Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge.""It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes.""The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."

More Cassandra Cons →

"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general.""There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."

More Neo4j Graph Database Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."
  • "There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."
  • "We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."
  • "We pay for a license."
  • "I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."
  • More Cassandra Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time… more »
    Top Answer:There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using… more »
    Top Answer:As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time.
    Top Answer:I don't have information about the license fee amount. That said, I know that the Neo4j license fee is more expensive than a local solution. There aren't really any extra costs. However, if we need a… more »
    Top Answer:So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    3,588
    Comparisons
    2,814
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    346
    Rating
    7.4
    7th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,142
    Comparisons
    743
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    872
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    DataStax logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing. 

    It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model. 

    It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

    Neo4j is the graph database solution allowing the analysis of complex relationships and patterns in data, leading to better decision-making and improved business processes. The graph database offers easy data integration from multiple sources, providing a more comprehensive view. 

    The most valuable aspect of a graph database is its performance and response time, as it does not use the join function and only has nodes and raw data. Overall, Neo4j, as a global first-ranking solution, has helped organizations become more efficient and effective in data analysis and decision-making processes.

    Sample Customers
    1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota
    Walmart, Telenor, Wazoku, Adidas, Cerved, GameSys, eBay, Schleich, ICIJ, die Bayerisch, Megree, InfoJobs, LinkedIn
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    University8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, InfluxDB, MongoDB, ScyllaDB and DataStax, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Accumulo, SingleStore, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.