Compare Cassandra vs. Neo4j

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cassandra Logo
4,642 views|3,688 comparisons
Neo4j Logo
1,781 views|1,167 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I haven't used SQream personally. However, if you are only considering GPU based rdbms's please check the following https://hackernoon.com/which-gpu-database-is-right-for-me-6ceef6a17505
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
3rd
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
4,642
Comparisons
3,688
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
292
Avg. Rating
9.0
7th
out of 16 in NoSQL Databases
Views
1,781
Comparisons
1,167
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
117
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Learn
Apache
Neo4j
Overview
A scalable multi-master database with no single points of failure. Scalability & high availability without compromising performance.

Neo4j is a highly scalable, native graph database purpose-built to leverage not only data but also its relationships.

Neo4j's native graph storage and processing engine deliver constant, real-time performance, helping enterprises build intelligent applications to meet today’s evolving data challenges.

Offer
Learn more about Cassandra
Learn more about Neo4j
Sample Customers
Apple, BazaarVoice, Best Buy, eBay, NetflixWalmart, Telenor, Wazoku, Adidas, Cerved, GameSys, eBay, Schleich, ICIJ, die Bayerisch, Megree, InfoJobs, LinkedIn
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company4%
No Data Available
Cassandra is ranked 3rd in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while Neo4j is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases. Cassandra is rated 9.0, while Neo4j is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Excellent for technical evaluation and managing very large amounts of data". On the other hand, Cassandra is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, Accumulo, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Vertica, whereas Neo4j is most compared with DataStax, MongoDB, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, MarkLogic and Apache HBase.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.