Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] vs OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] and OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In eDiscovery
17th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
213
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery
Catalyst e-Discovery
Learn More
Overview
EMC Kazeon eDiscovery is a quick-to-deploy appliance-based product that automates the in-house identification, collection, preservation, processing, analysis, and review of content that resides in live and archive data sources such as desktops, laptops, Common Internet File System (CIFS) and Network File System (NFS) file shares, Microsoft Exchange, Symantec Enterprise Vault, Microsoft SharePoint, and IBM Lotus Domino, and in corporate archives and content management repositories, such as EMC Documentum. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery in-place capabilities allows organizations to conduct eDiscovery and investigations, rapidly ascertain risk exposure, and meet privacy requirements while only collecting ESI which is relevant and legally obtainable. EMC Kazeon eDiscovery further provides flexibility, speed, and accuracy in transparently collecting relevant ESI in a defensible manner complete with auditing and data verification capabilities. With a simple user interface, legal teams can perform collection in a single step without requiring IT resources.
Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.
Sample Customers
Wentworth Douglass Hospital
Major CERCLA lawsuit
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in eDiscovery while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 17th in eDiscovery. Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Kazeon SourceOne eDiscovery [EOL] is most compared with OpenText EnCase eDiscovery, whereas OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with Actiance.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.