LexisNexis Concordance Classic vs OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LexisNexis Concordance Classic and OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
10th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
337
Comparisons
202
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
213
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Concordance Classic
Catalyst e-Discovery
Learn More
Overview
LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.
Sample Customers
Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
Major CERCLA lawsuit
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 10th in eDiscovery while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 17th in eDiscovery. LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0, while OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0. On the other hand, LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with IPRO, whereas OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with Actiance.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.