OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations and Smarsh eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
213
Comparisons
119
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
172
Comparisons
120
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Catalyst e-Discovery
Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery
Learn More
Overview
Catalyst's E-discovery cloud platform provides an integrated repository for the heart of the litigation lifecycle - from processing through search, analytics, review and production. It provides a smarter way to manage cases, investigations and regulatory requests using the Catalyst's central, single- instance document repository. It provides an Automated Redaction that will assist reviewers in eliminating privileged and confidential information from case files and it reduces the need for reviewers to manually scour documents and tediously block-redact individual portions.

eDiscovery is a comprehensive, end-to-end eDiscovery platform that Operates. It Combines powerful analytical tools with core strengths in understanding human information, it presents a choice of document review options to match the right workflow to each unique matter and can be combined with other offerings. Discovery delivers broad coverage across data repositories and myriad data types, and is language independent to give you the fastest, most-complete solution on the market. eDiscovery helps corporations, law firms, and government entities prepare for, and react to, legal matters involving large amounts of data - without bias to repository or location. A pioneer in legal holds, early case assessment, and Technology-Assisted Review, eDiscovery helps you solve the full breadth of discovery and investigations challenges, from data collection through production. It covers the full spectrum of requirements, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), information management, preservation, processing, early case assessment (ECA), review and analysis, and production, allowing you to avoid the risk and cost of switching tools or vendors at different stages of discovery. eDiscovery is underpinned by our IDOL technology, which provides access to hundreds of data types and reaches across myriad data silos throughout the enterprise, this patented software also helps you understand human-generated (unstructured) information and administer data in place.

Sample Customers
Major CERCLA lawsuit
Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is ranked 17th in eDiscovery while Smarsh eDiscovery is ranked 19th in eDiscovery. OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is rated 0.0, while Smarsh eDiscovery is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText eDiscovery and Investigations is most compared with Actiance, whereas Smarsh eDiscovery is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.