We performed a comparison between Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I haven't had any trouble, and practically forget that I'm using it."
"It's a cloud-based solution that integrates well with everything."
"The most valuable features of Cato Networks are the always-on VPN for remote workers and centralized management. Additionally, web filtering and antivirus are good."
"What I found most helpful in Cato Networks is that it works out of the box. One of its main advantages is that it's a simple product to deploy. You subscribe, and you're ready to run."
"When I first encountered Cato, I didn't know how to use it, but after a week of training, I could onboard our systems to it, so the solution was easy to learn and navigate."
"It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"We appreciate the optimization and acceleration of the performance of SDP users."
"The product is efficient and easy to use."
"It is totally awesome in terms of scalability. Its scalability was the main reason for moving to Google Cloud. It also comes with a lot of features. We are satisfied with the features it has."
"The app provides ready-made services that we can talk to without issue."
"It is a scalable solution."
"There is a certain accessibility feature that I can set using a cloud identity, which is really valuable to us."
"It's reliable."
"The platform’s most valuable features include storage, machine, and cloud functionality."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution."
"I am impressed with the product's security."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"Cato Networks security could be better."
"A little tweaking or improvement of the UI in terms of logging when troubleshooting would be an improvement because it's very detailed."
"They should include a web application firewall feature in the solution."
"I would like to see better integration with identity providers."
"I am located in South Korea, and I can say that most people here have no idea about Cato Networks. I think Cato Networks should promote its network services in various countries."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"Web application firewalling (WAF) is a feature we would like to have in this solution and does not exist yet."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"The product’s user interface must be more user-friendly and detailed."
"There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift."
"We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution."
"They should include case studies to learn about the use cases."
"Google is not well supported in France."
"The product is expensive. Its price needs improvement."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy has certain limitations as a document or file management system, especially for non-workspace accounts. Manual management is required for most actions, and group management can be challenging. The process of managing permissions individually is time-consuming and not very efficient. For education purposes, the collaboration tools for working on files, assignments, and groups need improvement. The existing tools are inadequate and can be difficult to work with. Additionally, the grading books for teachers are not very useful and require improvement."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 5th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 39 reviews. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler SASE, Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Private Access, Cisco Duo and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.