Compare Cato Networks vs. OPAQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Umbrella Logo
39,999 views|31,174 comparisons
Cato Networks Logo
4,914 views|3,647 comparisons
OPAQ Logo
92 views|72 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cato Networks and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: May 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is not an issue for us, as it is priced more competitively than some other vendors.""If you compare with VeloCloud, the price is the same or even cheaper.""You pay yearly based on the speed of your network. If you increase the speed of your network, you increase the cost for your throughput. It is by bandwidth for the most part and then licenses for VPN. There is some per-seat licensing for VPN access, but the majority of it is minimal. It is like $30 a year per client. The rest is based on how much bandwidth you'll use. You pay for that upfront for the year, and if you have to increase it, you increase it, and then they let you send more data through. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""Cato Networks seems more expensive than Cisco Meraki."

More Cato Networks Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its simplicity is most valuable. I can install it and get it up and running, and it can be pervasive across my business… more »
Top Answer: It has a reasonable price. It is certainly not as expensive as it used to be. It is in line with other offerings on the… more »
Top Answer: The API is very Cisco orientated, which is absolutely fine if you're using Cisco Firepower and SecureX kind of products… more »
Top Answer: It's a pretty straightforward solution.
Top Answer: We have the sockets on-premise, some little small boxes that connect to the internet. You could have multiple providers… more »
Top Answer: On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cato Networks an eight.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
OPAQ Network
Learn More
Fortinet
Video Not Available
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Cato connects your branch locations, physical and cloud datacenters, and mobile users into a secure and optimized global network in the cloud.

One Network, protected by One Security stack and enforcing One Policy.

The Cato Cloud Network is built on a globally distributed network of Points of Presence (PoPs). The PoPs are interconnected with an encrypted and optimized multi-carrier private backbone to ensure optimal global traffic routing. The Cato Cloud Network provides an affordable, SLA-backed, global enterprise network backbone.

OPAQ’s platform is purpose built to be partner friendly, empowering MSSPs, carriers and high value-add partners to easily integrate the SASE multi-tenant platform into their own offering and add value, to customers, with their Network Operations Center and Security Operations Center expertise and advanced professional services.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Cato Networks
Learn more about OPAQ
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Paysafe, AdRoll, Pet Lovers Centre, Arlington Orthopedics, Humphreys & Partners Architects
Sodexo, Volkswagen Group Retail, Alaska Airlines
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company23%
Manufacturing Company5%
Financial Services Firm5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cato Networks and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: May 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cato Networks is ranked 3rd in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews while OPAQ is ranked 18th in ZTNA as a Service. Cato Networks is rated 8.8, while OPAQ is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cato Networks writes "Easy to deploy, easy to manage, and helpful for network stability and reliability". On the other hand, Cato Networks is most compared with Zscaler SASE, Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet FortiGate, whereas OPAQ is most compared with Zscaler SASE.

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.