We performed a comparison between Cavirin and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Wiz and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)."Overall, this is a good solution that scales well. It is easily deployed and is non intrusive on systems."
"Machine Learning and AI for email security have helped all the organization's members to guard their information against insecure exposure."
"The setup is very easy. I haven't faced any complexity with the setup of the solution."
"Its analysis or emulation in the review of each file using the cloud and Check Point helps make each interaction via email more secure."
"The API is its most valuable feature. On the API side, relative to the rest of the market, Check Point is decades ahead of its competitors."
"The product's environment is easy to work and comprehensive."
"Check Point adds value with east-west protection in the data center."
"The first most remarkable thing is the integration with the Office 365 solution, which is easy, fast, and totally transparent for the user."
"The product is reliable and sturdy."
"The reporting for this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have an extension into the on-prem for CIS in compliance reporting."
"Other vendor support teams go after fixing the issue the moment that they join the remote session. The problem that I have faced with Check Point support is that they share the case number with me, then it takes at least two days for them to join a remote session with us, even though we have asked for this timeframe to change. Even though we have already explained the problems that we are facing or the business pain points in our network on the call or email, we have to repeat the problem statements again in the console. It can take four or five days to resolve the issue from the moment they understand the problem. This includes the time to teach their R&D or internal team whatever the issue is. I have faced timeframes as long as seven to 10 days for fixing some issues."
"Its guides are not great."
"At this time, the two-factor authentication does not work for Active Directory."
"Support can be a bit quicker in helping the customer."
"From time to time, the system's administrators notice the increase in the false-positive alerts being reported by CloudGuard SaaS."
"Check Point has to continue refining the intelligence engine to minimize the number of false positives."
"There is always room for improvement and growth."
"We are unable to export the reports from the dashboard, and if it is possible to do then it is not intuitive."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cavirin is ranked 26th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 1 review while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 8th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 47 reviews. Cavirin is rated 7.0, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cavirin writes "Cyber security solution that provides actionable reports within 30 minutes and completes auto patching". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Cavirin is most compared with , whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.