We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetDiagnostics and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
Earn 20 points
Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 85th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
