We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetStorm and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools."Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way."
"This tool helps to focus on real-time transactions that occur at a very high rate."
"NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."
"Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable."
"It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty."
"The best feature of the solution is that we can utilize the Tosca scripts for NeoLoad execution."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."
"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."
"The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web."
"Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting."
"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."
"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."
"In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing."
"Some users may find NeoLoad too technical, while other users may prefer a scripting language instead of a UI with figures and forms they have to fill in."
"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us."
"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"Connecting with the solution's technical support can be time-consuming. The turnaround time for a ticket raised is around 72 hours, which becomes an issue when working on a huge project in our company."
"The solution can be improved by introducing a secure testing feature."
Earn 20 points
Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 19th in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Load Testing Tools with 58 reviews. Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.4, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Apache JMeter, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.