We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cavisson NetStorm vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage.""Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way."

More Cavisson NetStorm Pros »

"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""The stability is okay.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros »

Cons
"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs.""Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

More Cavisson NetStorm Cons »

"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based.""Its licensing cost is very less."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
Ranking
6th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
685
Comparisons
389
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
640
Rating
9.5
5th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
6,316
Comparisons
3,716
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
508
Rating
7.8
Comparisons
Also Known As
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More
Cavisson
Video Not Available
Overview

Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective, performance enhancing and easy-to-use appliance for enterprise applications. It is an extremely powerful load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee the Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its advanced technology efficiently handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues where legacy solutions failed, prompting Several Fortune 100 companies switching over to using NetStorm.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Offer
Learn more about Cavisson NetStorm
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer92%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Retailer29%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Comms Service Provider3%
REVIEWERS
Retailer18%
Government18%
Computer Software Company18%
Individual & Family Service12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise74%
REVIEWERS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 6th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. See our Cavisson NetStorm vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.