We performed a comparison between CCH Tagetik and OneStream XF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy."
"Has an APM, which deals with the details of data and has calculation functions included."
"The most valuable feature of CCH Tagetik is form creation."
"I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Register, which benefits certain entities. The workflow feature is great, but it can become overly detailed and lacks clear guidance on design. The solution is good in terms of storage."
"We were with Oracle previously. With Oracle, you have to buy a different piece of software for every business process. If you want to do budgeting, that's a product. If you want to do consolidation, that's a product. If you want to do BI type of work, that's yet another product. So, you end up buying a lot of software from Oracle. With OneStream, it is a little different. It is a platform where you can do all those things, and you can do them with just one software purchase and then you just pay for users on it."
"It offers great ease of use. This impacts not only the end-user experience but also the administrator's, which affects the total cost of ownership."
"The product's most valuable feature is extensibility."
"Analytics function is weak. Other products have sum(irate) function and forecasting help function, but Tagetik does not have this clarity."
"There is room for improvement, especially on the settings side of the solution."
"We faced difficulties while uploading data."
"The tool's major drawback is the ETL process, which is not up to par with other solutions."
"Currently, they only support one browser, and it would be good if you could use it on Chrome, Firefox, etc. It is a little frustrating that you can only use a certain Microsoft browser. They're pretty tightly aligned with Microsoft. So, I can see the reasons for it."
"AI is where I see the most innovation and progress, but it's not fully developed yet."
"We should be able to download the data in the same format we upload it."
CCH Tagetik is ranked 13th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews while OneStream XF is ranked 10th in Business Performance Management with 3 reviews. CCH Tagetik is rated 7.6, while OneStream XF is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CCH Tagetik writes "User-friendly performance management with intuitive approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneStream XF writes "Easy-to-setup product with efficient data integration". CCH Tagetik is most compared with SAP Business Planning and Consolidation, Oracle HFM, Oracle Hyperion, Anaplan and Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud, whereas OneStream XF is most compared with Oracle HFM, Oracle Hyperion, Anaplan, IBM Planning Analytics and Adaptive Insights. See our CCH Tagetik vs. OneStream XF report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors and best Financial Close Software vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
