Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] vs Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] and Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
Views
167
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Application Control Engine
Citrix ITM
Learn More
Cisco
Video Not Available
Overview
Application Control Engine Module is a next-generation load-balancing and application-delivery solution. A member of the Cisco family of Data Center 3.0 solutions, the module helps ensure business continuity by increasing application availability, improves business productivity by accelerating application and server performance, reduces data center power, space, and cooling needs through a virtualized architecture and helps lower operational costs associated with application provisioning and scaling.

With billions of real user measurements a day, from every corner of the internet, Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management monitors internet traffic issues in real time and automatically steers your traffic to avoid them.

Whether you host your applications and content on premises, in the cloud or in content delivery networks (CDNs), Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management allows you to globally load balance all traffic, dynamically optimizing the user experience and lowering service costs. Citrix uses real-time machine learning to direct user requests to the most suitable content source.

Sample Customers
LightEdge
Dataport, Bet365, VFLI, Rhode & Schwartz
Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is ranked 19th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] is rated 4.0, while Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] writes "Uncertain future. No clear direction yet". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management writes "It's a robust and proven solution that we've been working with for many years". Cisco Application Control Engine [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is most compared with Citrix NetScaler.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.