We performed a comparison between Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management and Kemp LoadMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."We use the HDX protocol, a high-performing component of the Citrix solutions. We also use provisioning to generate VM and NetScaler ADC solutions to propose access to applications for our customers."
"The most beneficial function of using the ADC is to ensure this resiliency."
"Mitigates content security policy issues."
"LoadMaster is easy to deploy and understand."
"With Kemp 360 Central, our customers get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade firmware on all devices from a single interface."
"Managing and maintaining multiple servers is done in a single place."
"We are most impressed with the ease of use and great support."
"I like the way this solution handles multiple SSLs in different domains while still load balancing."
"The DNS Load Balancer makes it so that I don't have to worry about site failures."
"We discussed problems with the network products with the Indian teams. The support center for network products is located in India. There are language barriers and issues with the time difference, so we sometimes face restrictions when dealing with this team."
"It would be helpful if there were a way to incorporate tooltips on the fields so that we don't have to dig through documentation."
"I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement."
"So far, the only hitch we have run into is that would have been nice to have an easier method to add allow/whitelist entries into the Access Control lists for virtual services."
"Over the last several major versions, the GUI has remained virtually unchanged and still seems lacking."
"In the next release, Kemp should include the ability for LoadMaster to create different DNS record types."
"In my opinion, the layer seven loads balancing that we're mainly using for web servers, doesn't seem to pick up when there are issues at the application level."
"The GUI is rather technical and complex, so it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly."
"I definitely think that the WAF can be improved."
Earn 20 points
Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is ranked 19th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Kemp LoadMaster is ranked 6th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 48 reviews. Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is rated 8.0, while Kemp LoadMaster is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management writes "It's a robust and proven solution that we've been working with for many years". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kemp LoadMaster writes "Reliable, easy to set up, and can increase your security score". Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, whereas Kemp LoadMaster is most compared with HAProxy, NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler, Fortinet FortiADC and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
