Cedexis Impact [EOL] vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo
views| comparisons
Correlsense Logo
139 views|108 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cedexis Impact [EOL] and Correlsense SharePath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
139
Comparisons
108
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SharePath
Learn More
Overview
Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
SharePath enables IT to deliver on the promise of reliable and predictable business services delivery. SharePath tracks every individual transaction across all hops from a click in the browser through all the data center layers and back. SharePath's unique ability to analyze and model cross-tier transaction behavior based on that data ensures that if a performance problem occurs, you know immediately where, why, and who is affected.
Sample Customers
Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Correlsense SharePath is ranked 84th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Correlsense SharePath is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Correlsense SharePath writes "It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications". Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Correlsense SharePath is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.