Cedexis Impact [EOL] vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo
views| comparisons
Nastel Technologies Logo
173 views|122 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cedexis Impact [EOL] and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Cedexis Impact [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
173
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
Sample Customers
Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 79th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.