• Home
  • Cedexis Impact [EOL] vs. Omnipliance

Cedexis Impact [EOL] vs Omnipliance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo

Cedexis Impact [EOL]

views| comparisons
LiveAction Logo

Omnipliance

228 views|215 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cedexis Impact [EOL] and Omnipliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
63rd
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
228
Comparisons
215
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Savvius Omnipliance
Learn More
Citrix
LiveAction
Video Not Available
Overview
Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
Savvius Omnipliance, an industry-leading packet capture and analysis appliance, enables real-time and post-event analytics at up to 25 Gbps. Using Savvius packet intelligence, Omnipliance gives IT engineers the power to resolve network and application performance issues on 1/10/40 Gigabit Ethernet, 802.11ac WLAN, VoIP, and video-over-IP networks. Omnipliance features both powerful network recording for capturing terabytes of traffic with no packet loss, and award-winning Capture Engine for Omnipeek software for performing real-time analysis of live network traffic and forensic network analysis of recorded traffic.
Sample Customers
Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
Cisco Systems, Ekahau, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Omnipliance is ranked 63rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Omnipliance is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Omnipliance is most compared with Savision Live Maps.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.