We performed a comparison between Celonis and QPR ProcessAnalyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."We used to draw errors to be processed manually, and now you can get the digital information directly with the help of Celonis."
"The process chart is valuable in identifying the bottlenecks."
"They have in-built connectors for connecting to various systems."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. It's very good. It offers good data consistently."
"I have found the automatic mapping of the processes themselves to be a valuable feature."
"The solution offers a very good user interface."
"find Action Engine for notifying the user, and also Studio Spark, and knowledge models; all these features are useful."
"In my opinion, it's quite an advanced tool."
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"They should provide a community edition license so that everyone can deploy or install it on their own system and get more hands-on experience with the product."
"The process analytics could be a bit easier."
"It should be more flexible. It is not particularly flexible in the way it works, and it is quite rigid. It has some very strong structures that you have to follow. It could certainly be made more user-friendly to understand and should have fewer requirements for manipulation of the data to create the visualizations. We should also get better support from Celonis, and they also need to make the licensing model slightly different."
"In the next release, I would like for them to integrate more custom features to ease the process of having multiple solutions. I would like to be able to integrate it with other solutions."
"The cost could be improved."
"They need to provide readymade value stream mapping."
"The support costs are very high."
"The one thing that could be improved is the guides are not getting updated to cover new features and upgrades, which means we can't use them at their full potential."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
Earn 20 points
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 44 reviews while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining. Celonis is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Great process mining, process discovery, and opportunity identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, UiPath Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS Process Mining and BIC Process Mining, whereas QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
