We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and ITRS Geneos based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The machine learning feature is valuable."
"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."
"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."
"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."
"The clean and colorful UI and easy to use options like snooze and active times."
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"
"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."
"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."
"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."
"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."
"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."
"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."
Earn 20 points
Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while ITRS Geneos is ranked 12th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 57 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". Centerity Monitor is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Prometheus and Datadog.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
