Centerity Monitor vs Splunk APM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Centerity Systems Logo
407 views|245 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Splunk Logo
812 views|557 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and Splunk APM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The machine learning feature is valuable."

More Centerity Monitor Pros →

"Detectors are a powerful feature.""The solution is stable and reliable.""The volume it handles is very good, including the number of metrics, the volume number of traces, and more.""The most beneficial aspect of Slunk APM is the ATM, which is the map displaying the inbound and outbound relationships of the microservices, as well as the traffic between these dependencies. This feature provides us with valuable insights and helps us understand the interactions between different microservices.""The features are pretty much ready out of the box.""I like the fact that Splunk APM makes it easy to connect to the application database and run queries against the data.""Splunk APM has helped us to standardize logging and monitoring procedures.""It is a good tool. It allows you to set alerts for application and infrastructure monitoring, and it allows you to create dashboards."

More Splunk APM Pros →

Cons
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."

More Centerity Monitor Cons →

"The licensing model is expensive. We need to monitor the amount of data ingested because the cost is based on the data collected.""They can improve the flow system and the keyword language. It has predefined keywords, but they can be improved.""Splunk APM should include a better correlation between resources and infrastructure monitoring.""The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future.""We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM.""It is essential for the monitoring tool to deliver quick response times when generating analytical reports, instead of prolonged delays.""The monitoring of workloads when using SignalFx could be improved.""I've been using the Splunk query language, and it can be a bit time-consuming to set up the queries I need."

More Splunk APM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of Slunk APM is less than some of its competitors."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • "Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."
  • More Splunk APM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Detectors are a powerful feature.
    Top Answer:We currently lack log analysis capabilities in Splunk APM. Implementing this functionality would be very beneficial. With log analysis, we could eliminate our dependence on Splunk Enterprise and rely… more »
    Top Answer:We use Splunk APM to monitor the performance of our applications.
    Ranking
    Views
    407
    Comparisons
    245
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    812
    Comparisons
    557
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    620
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Centerity is the pioneer provider of an All-in-One, IT Monitoring and Business Service Management (BSM) platform. Whereas legacy tools have focused on monitoring individual technologies which led to silos of performance data, Centerity breaks down silos by extending its monitoring coverage across all technology layers, from infrastructure (physical, virtual, converged, AWS, etc.) to applications (OS, SAP, Cloudera, etc.) and databases (SAP HANA, Hadoop, NoSQL, etc.), thereby providing an integrated, holistic view of system health, performance and availability. Centerity’s unique, unified platform, named a Gartner Cool Vendor in ITOM, can serve the needs of both IT executives and administrators while providing a complete business intelligence layer across all IT assets via cross technical and functional domain impact and trend analysis through its Business Service Management (BSM) capabilities.

    Splunk APM is a comprehensive application performance monitoring solution that provides real-time insights into the performance and availability of your applications. 

    It offers end-to-end visibility across the entire application stack, from the front-end user experience to the back-end infrastructure. With Splunk APM, you can proactively identify and resolve performance issues, optimize application performance, and ensure a seamless user experience. 

    Splunk APM leverages machine learning and AI-powered analytics to automatically detect anomalies and provide actionable insights. The product supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, making it suitable for both monolithic and microservices-based architectures. It also integrates seamlessly with other Splunk products, allowing you to correlate APM data with logs, metrics, and other operational data for a holistic view of your application environment. 

    With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Splunk APM empowers developers, operations teams, and business stakeholders to deliver high-performing applications and drive better business outcomes.

    Sample Customers
    Centerity Systems has thousands of customers world wide, including Fortune 500 Enterprises such as Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, Harris Corporation, and Coca-Cola.
    Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government7%
    Construction Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Pharma/Biotech Company11%
    Educational Organization11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise93%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk APM is ranked 14th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 12 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while Splunk APM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk APM writes "Provides great visibility, analysis, and data telemetry". Centerity Monitor is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Splunk APM is most compared with Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), Sentry, Elastic Observability, Monte Carlo and Grafana.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.