CyberArk Identity vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.""It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening.""I found the solution to be stable.""The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory.""The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS.""The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half.""The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward.""The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."

More CyberArk Identity Pros →

"The solution has high support capability.""The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →

Cons
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area.""The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps.""We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.""CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement.""The user interface could be improved.""They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature.""The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support.""I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."

More CyberArk Identity Cons →

"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app.""The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."
  • "There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."
  • "I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."
  • "The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."
  • "There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."
  • "In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."
  • "CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."
  • "It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."
  • More CyberArk Identity Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten. The tool's licensing is monthly."
  • More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users.
    Top Answer:It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive. It's like choosing between Volkswagen and… more »
    Top Answer:CyberArk Identity could improve by allowing federation directly or seamlessly, without the need for an Identity Connector. Instead of building separate Azure Connectors, if they could just federate… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    989
    Comparisons
    828
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    480
    Rating
    7.9
    25th
    Views
    157
    Comparisons
    109
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Idaptive
    AccessMatrix Universal Access Management, i-Sprint Innovations AccessMatrix, AccessMatrix
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

    CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

    • Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
    • Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
    • Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
    • Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

    According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

    IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

    AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.

    Sample Customers
    MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
    IRAS, Singapore Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Insurance Company10%
    Consumer Goods Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 25th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.