We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"Intune device restriction policies enable me to enforce limitations on the device, like blocking the mobile camera or restricting the employees from using and inserting USB devices, including thumb drives and flash drives."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"For Windows services, there are multiple options within Intune to modernize it to be more internet-facing and dynamic."
"I like how Microsoft Intune lets me lock down the email profile and make it accessible only on certain devices."
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."
"I'm not sure what needs improvement. It is a good platform."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"The user interface could be improved."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."
"Sometimes, customers compare it with AirWatch, but the concept of Intune is different from other solutions. It's an application management app. It gets a bit difficult to explain it to customers, but it's not a product limitation. It takes a presale document or presentation to explain it to customers."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
"Intune has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions."
"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."
"They need to integrate more with security options."
"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) with 156 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". CyberArk Identity is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingFederate and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Entra ID.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.