Most Helpful Review
Researched Micro Focus Fortify on Demand but chose Veracode: Improved our security posture without the overhead of supporting infrastructure
Use Cequence Security? Share your opinion.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.
They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.
Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.
No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.
It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.
I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.
Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.
I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.
Information Not Available
The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition.
It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount.
The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server.
The subscription model, on a per-scan basis, is a bit expensive. That's another reason we are not using it for all the apps.
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cequence ASP||Fortify on Demand|
|Veracode||Cequence Security||Micro Focus|
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.
Cequence Security delivers automated software solutions to protect the web, mobile, and API application services that hyper-connected organizations rely on to support business processes and customer engagements. Recognized as a 2018 Gartner Cool Vendor, we strengthen the security posture of our customers and improve the productivity and efficiency of their IT staff.
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand’s application security-as-a-service is the easy and flexible way to identify vulnerabilities in your applications without additional investment in software or personnel. Allow our global team to work for you, providing support and technical expertise 24/7.
Keep your software secure
Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.
Learn more about Cequence Security
Learn more about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
|State of Missouri, Rekner|
Information Not Available
|SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.|
Financial Services Firm31%
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm42%
Non Tech Company8%
Software R&D Company43%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available