Compare Cequence Security vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle

Cequence Security is ranked 34th in Application Security while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is ranked 3rd in Application Security with 17 reviews. Cequence Security is rated 0, while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle writes "Checks our libraries for security and licensing issues". Cequence Security is most compared with , whereas Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck and WhiteSource.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
60,055 views|32,007 comparisons
Cequence Security Logo
95 views|66 comparisons
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Logo
8,711 views|4,784 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Cequence Security? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool.I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms.Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good.I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others.

Read more »

Information Not Available
The license fee may be a bit harder for startups to justify. But it will save you a headache later as well as peace of mind. Additionally, it shows your own customers that you value security stuff and will protect yourselves from any licensing issues, which is good marketing too.In addition to the license fee for IQ Server, you have to factor in some running costs. We use AWS, so we spun up an additional VM to run this. If the database is RDS that adds a little bit extra too. Of course someone could run it on a pre-existing VM or physical server to reduce costs. I should add that compared to the license fee, the running costs are so minimal they had no effect on our decision to use IQ Server.Our licensing costs are on an annual basis. The Sonatype licensing model is transparent with no hidden costs or holes.The price is good. We certainly get a lot more in return. However, it's also hard to get the funds to roll out such a product for the entire firm. Therefore, pricing has been a limiting factor for us. However, it's a fair price.Pricing is decent. It's not horrible. It's middle-of-the-road, as far as our ranking goes. They're a little bit more but that's also because they provide more.Pricing is comparable with some of the other products. We are happy with the pricing.We're pretty happy with the price, for what it is delivering for us and the value we're getting from it.Its pricing is competitive within the market. It's not very cheap, it's not very expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
Cequence ASPNexus Lifecycle
Learn
Veracode
Video Not Available
Cequence Security
Video Not Available
Sonatype
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Cequence Security delivers automated software solutions to protect the web, mobile, and API application services that hyper-connected organizations rely on to support business processes and customer engagements. Recognized as a 2018 Gartner Cool Vendor, we strengthen the security posture of our customers and improve the productivity and efficiency of their IT staff.

Nexus Lifecycle gives you full control over your software supply chain and allows you to define rules, actions, and policies that work best for your organization and teams.

Offer
Keep your software secure

Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

Learn more about Cequence Security
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
Genome.One, Blackboard, Crediterform, Crosskey, Intuit, Progress Software, Qualys, Liberty Mutual Insurance
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer8%
Consumer Goods8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Insurance Company29%
Transportation Company7%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise74%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.