Certes Layer 4 vs Cisco Duo comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Certes Networks Logo
18 views|14 comparisons
Cisco Logo
1,640 views|1,209 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Certes Layer 4 and Cisco Duo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "During testing we are allowed a certain number of licenses for free."
  • "Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive."
  • "Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs."
  • "Our licensing fee is currently on an annual basis."
  • "The licensing is very good because it does not cost a lot of money. It's affordable for all-sized customers, including enterprises. There is an additional cost for premium support."
  • "Duo Security is free."
  • "With regard to pricing, for a small business buying a one off, it's pretty expensive. If it's an enterprise that has thousands of employees, however, it's really nothing to protect your data because if your network goes down or it's breached, you're losing millions of dollars every minute. When it comes to a large enterprise, it's priced where it should be because you're talking business to business. You're not talking business to consumer."
  • "Price wise, it's not cheap, but it's not expensive at all either. It's in the middle."
  • More Cisco Duo Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier Duo Security is easy to configure and… more »
    Top Answer:They are users who, as mentioned before, utilize RDPAP and MDPAP. It includes functionalities related to finance, specifically in single sign-on.
    Top Answer:I am not aware of the pricing. There are two departments, and I don't have any information about them.
    Ranking
    26th
    out of 34 in ZTNA
    Views
    18
    Comparisons
    14
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,640
    Comparisons
    1,209
    Reviews
    43
    Average Words per Review
    758
    Rating
    8.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Certes CryptoFlow, Certes CryptoFlow Net Creator
    Duo Security
    Learn More
    Interactive Demo
    Overview

    With Certes CryptoFlow Solutions, enterprises and managed service providers can create tunnel-less, multi-point, multi-layer VPNs that protect traffic for any application over any network. CryptoFlow VPNs protect data moving across LAN, WAN, Internet, Virtual and Cloud environments. A CryptoFlow VPN can be set up in a few seconds with Certes’ amazingly simple point-and-click security policy interface.

    Cisco Duo is a cloud-based access management platform that secures access to all applications, for any user and device, from anywhere. It’s designed to be both easy to use and deploy, while providing complete endpoint visibility and control.

    Duo verifies users' identities with strong passwordless authentication and industry-leading multi-factor authentication. Paired with deep insights into your users’ devices, Duo gives you the policies and control you need to limit access based on endpoint or user risk. Users get a consistent login experience with Duo's single sign-on that delivers centralized access to both on-premises and cloud applications.

    With Duo, you can protect against compromised credentials and risky devices, as well as unwanted access to your applications and data. This combination of user and device trust builds a strong foundation for a zero trust security model.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Certes Layer 4 is ranked 26th in ZTNA while Cisco Duo is ranked 3rd in ZTNA as a Service with 55 reviews. Certes Layer 4 is rated 0.0, while Cisco Duo is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Duo writes "Helps reduce the risk of a breach and is easy to deploy and onboard". Certes Layer 4 is most compared with , whereas Cisco Duo is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Yubico YubiKey and UserLock.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.