Compare Certes Layer 4 vs. Scytale

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Certes Layer 4 Logo
126 views|62 comparisons
Scytale Logo
20 views|5 comparisons
Ranking
9th
out of 19 in ZTNA
Views
126
Comparisons
62
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 19 in ZTNA
Views
20
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Certes CryptoFlow, Certes CryptoFlow Net Creator
Learn More
Overview

With Certes CryptoFlow Solutions, enterprises and managed service providers can create tunnel-less, multi-point, multi-layer VPNs that protect traffic for any application over any network. CryptoFlow VPNs protect data moving across LAN, WAN, Internet, Virtual and Cloud environments. A CryptoFlow VPN can be set up in a few seconds with Certes’ amazingly simple point-and-click security policy interface.

As enterprises adopt cloud computing and containers, they end up working with additional, platform-specific identity providers. Authenticating applications or software services across platforms requires a tremendous effort and hinders cloud or container migration efforts and development velocity. They need a flexible yet consistent solution for authenticating services, regardless of which platform they run on.

Offer
Learn more about Certes Layer 4
Learn more about Scytale

Certes Layer 4 is ranked 9th in ZTNA while Scytale is ranked 17th in ZTNA. Certes Layer 4 is rated 0.0, while Scytale is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Certes Layer 4 is most compared with , whereas Scytale is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.