CGI Performance Testing Services vs Cigniti Mobile Testing Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
92
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
194
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
CGI
Video Not Available
Overview

Traditional testing automation is a slow and complex, two-step process in which manual testers write a test case and then bring in senior automation coding experts (also called “automators”) to write a script to automate the case. Automators must then create, execute and maintain these complex scripts, the framework to run them, and the underlying software testing tool integrated development environments (IDE’s).

Cigniti provides deep experience in cross-browser testing for mobile applications for both functional and non-functional (Manual & Automated) testing of mobile applications. Cigniti’s Mobile Testing Center of Excellence (TCoE) constitutes of 500+ mobile testing professionals. While our mobile app testers are certified in various commercial & open source mobile testing tools, our test architects & engineers have 6+ years of experience in mobile testing for various domains such as Banking, Insurance, Travel, Retail, and more leveraging industry leading mobile testing tools & best practices.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Pure Insurance, Atom Bank, Baptcare, Magma Fincorp, Purolator, Insperity, Synovus, FREEMAN, Ryanair, Nimble Money, YPO, Argon Credit, Neptune Tech, Ryanair

CGI Performance Testing Services is ranked 18th in Application Testing Services while Cigniti Mobile Testing Services is ranked 11th in Application Testing Services. CGI Performance Testing Services is rated 0.0, while Cigniti Mobile Testing Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CGI Performance Testing Services is most compared with , whereas Cigniti Mobile Testing Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.