CHAMPS vs Infor Lawson M3 EAM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CHAMPS Logo
55 views|42 comparisons
Infor Logo
views| comparisons
Ranking
Views
55
Comparisons
42
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Enterprise Asset Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
Lawson M3 EAM
Learn More
Overview
CHAMPS is designed to deliver powerful functionality with logical features that enable the customer to set-up the system to match their work flow. Modular components are fully integrated to effectively address critical areas throughout the enterprise while offering the flexibility to operate as standalone solutions. Optional components work seamlessly in the application to create a comprehensive solution for the entire enterprise.
Infor Lawson M3 is an industry-specific, comprehensive ERP software, a cloud or on-premise deployment, that supports Multisite, multi-company, multi-country, multicurrency, and multi-language. It supports 21 languages and 45 countries and provides a built-in flexibility that enables configuration to unique business processes.
Sample Customers
Appvion Inc., Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Delaware North, Hershey Entertainment and Resorts, Muscatine Power & Water, The Port Authority of Jamaica, Quaker Oats, W&T Offshore, City of Tallahassees Electric Company
Allcargo India Ltd., AWE, Bentley University, Brewster Dairy, CEFAS, CERN, City of Des Moines, City of Oak Ridge, Coca-Cola Enterprises Norway, Cornr Bank, Cremer, Energy Transfer, Grimmway Farms, Keystone Foods, Massimo Zanetti, PRIDE Industries, Sescam, Takeda, Technip Ships, Universita Cattolica Milan

CHAMPS is ranked 25th in Enterprise Asset Management while Infor Lawson M3 EAM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Asset Management. CHAMPS is rated 0.0, while Infor Lawson M3 EAM [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CHAMPS is most compared with , whereas Infor Lawson M3 EAM [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.