Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management and Planview Daptiv based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's tech support is good.""I like Primavera's planning capabilities.""The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy.""The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable.""Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pros →

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable.""The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code.""The timekeeping features are great and very helpful.""I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus.""Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

More Planview Daptiv Pros →

Cons
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP.""Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features.""The scalability has room for improvement.""The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve.""The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Cons →

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance.""It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality.""Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include.""I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product.""This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

More Planview Daptiv Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is highly priced compared to one of its competitors."
  • "Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is an expensive solution. There is an upfront cost to purchase the solution and then there are annual fees to use the solution."
  • "The solution itself is cost-effective."
  • "My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay."
  • More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."
  • "It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."
  • More Planview Daptiv Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of the main differences between Oracle Primavera Unifier and SAP Portfolio and Project Management Oracle Primavera Unifier Web-based Has a focus on Asset Management and… more »
    Top Answer:Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective.
    Top Answer:My company has made an annual payment towards the costs of the solution. Price-wise, the solution is okay.
    Top Answer:It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project… more »
    Top Answer:The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization was establishing a new project management office within one of the business divisions that did not utilize Planview Daptiv to a significant degree. They were planning to utilize it as… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    599
    Comparisons
    501
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    476
    Comparisons
    303
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    728
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Primavera Portfolio Management, OPPM, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.
    Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.
    Sample Customers
    Yarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District
    AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company14%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews while Planview Daptiv is ranked 12th in Project Portfolio Management with 12 reviews. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2, while Planview Daptiv is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planview Daptiv writes "Useful project management capabilities, beneficial dashboards, but project planning could improve". Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with JIRA Portfolio, Microsoft Project Server, EcoSys, Broadcom Clarity and LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal, whereas Planview Daptiv is most compared with Broadcom Clarity , Jira and Planview Portfolios. See our Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs. Planview Daptiv report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.