Chatter vs IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Salesforce Logo
462 views|405 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Chatter and IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
462
Comparisons
405
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Enterprise Social Software
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Lotus Quickr
Learn More
Overview

Chatter is a part of the sales cloud service that SalesForce1 provides for businesses looking to optimize their efficiency by transferring most or all of their data onto a cloud server. Chatter is the social media platform aspect of this service. It has many functions, including the capability to post comments as status updates for others to view, a news feed to receive these updates immediately, user profiles, and groups.

Chatter is used widely to cut out the kind of inefficiencies that come from having a sprawling network of team members and locations for data that frequently never come together despite the fact that they are a9ll needed for the same project. With this service, team members are able to share,collaborate, and discuss ideas about their project, tweak each others progress, and create a more productive work force overall.

IBM Lotus Quickr is team collaboration software that can help you access and interact with the people, information and project materials you need to get your work done.

Lotus Quickr team spaces, content libraries, team discussion forums, wikis, and connectors make it easy to share documents and information amongst a team, and Lotus Quickr software works with your enterprise content management system, as well as with Lotus Notes, Lotus Connections, Lotus Sametime, Lotus Symphony, Microsoft Office and Microsoft Outlook.

Sample Customers
Coca Cola Enterprise, Blue Shield of California, Stanley Black & Decker, Wells Fargo Bank, Phillips, Toyota Motors, American Red Cross, Time Warner Cable, Virgin America,Canon, and Bayer Pharmaceuticals.
Aibel AS, KDZ Wiesbaden, Ahlers AG, Integra Legal, Rheinmetall AG
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company15%
Insurance Company8%
Government8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chatter is ranked 12th in Enterprise Social Software while IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Enterprise Social Software. Chatter is rated 7.0, while IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Chatter writes "Contextualized collaboration on records allows you to have historical conversations that are accessible by other users". On the other hand, Chatter is most compared with Slack, Yammer, Microsoft Teams and NICE CXone, whereas IBM Lotus Quickr [EOL] is most compared with Oracle WebCenter and Atlassian Confluence.

See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.