Chatter vs WyzeTalk comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Salesforce Logo
462 views|405 comparisons
Wyzetalk Logo
47 views|27 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Chatter and WyzeTalk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Social Software Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
462
Comparisons
405
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
47
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Slack logo
Compared 40% of the time.
Yammer logo
Compared 30% of the time.
Microsoft Teams logo
Compared 24% of the time.
NICE CXone logo
Compared 7% of the time.
Learn More
Overview

Chatter is a part of the sales cloud service that SalesForce1 provides for businesses looking to optimize their efficiency by transferring most or all of their data onto a cloud server. Chatter is the social media platform aspect of this service. It has many functions, including the capability to post comments as status updates for others to view, a news feed to receive these updates immediately, user profiles, and groups.

Chatter is used widely to cut out the kind of inefficiencies that come from having a sprawling network of team members and locations for data that frequently never come together despite the fact that they are a9ll needed for the same project. With this service, team members are able to share,collaborate, and discuss ideas about their project, tweak each others progress, and create a more productive work force overall.

The Wyzetalk Connect Platform gives you the ability to engage and communicate with every employee, on any device - regardless of role, level and region.

The platform flexibility allows employees to engage with you via their mobile device - sharing feedback, employee insights, ideas, process improvement, and underlying concerns such as inequality, mismanagement or corruption at any level of the organisation.

Sample Customers
Coca Cola Enterprise, Blue Shield of California, Stanley Black & Decker, Wells Fargo Bank, Phillips, Toyota Motors, American Red Cross, Time Warner Cable, Virgin America,Canon, and Bayer Pharmaceuticals.
Deli, First National Bank, Barloworld Logistics, Premier, Truton, Telesure, DialDirect, Cross Roads, EOH, Cash Crusaders, AngloGold Ashanti, Altron, Hello Doctor, Crabtree
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Computer Software Company16%
Insurance Company8%
Government8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise86%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Social Software
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Chatter is ranked 12th in Enterprise Social Software while WyzeTalk is ranked 29th in Enterprise Social Software. Chatter is rated 7.0, while WyzeTalk is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Chatter writes "Contextualized collaboration on records allows you to have historical conversations that are accessible by other users". On the other hand, Chatter is most compared with Slack, Yammer, Microsoft Teams and NICE CXone, whereas WyzeTalk is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.