We performed a comparison between Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] and IBM MaaS360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Sophos, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Mobile Data Protection."It is very simple to install and use."
"The antivirus is great since it helps us with the real-time protection of all devices."
"Check Point Capsule can use SSO so that we can use a single identity for all our users and tasks in the organization."
"We're taking advantage of the computing power that the cloud has made."
"We've found the scalability to be very good."
"All features that we have deployed are useful. We do access office emails on our smartphones, and we have complete sync with Active Directory. Our calendar also gets synced in the MaaS360 application. We also ensure that the data from these official applications is not being misused by any of the employees. We have disabled cut, copy, paste, and all such features. It ensures that all the official data that our employees have on their smartphones is secure. Security is the paramount feature that we value in this product."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security."
"The most valuable feature is that it's comprehensive - it covers mobile devices and laptops in one package."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"There should be more clarity when it comes to licensing because it is difficult to understand."
"Check Point has already been making several changes to Check Point Capsule and has transformed it into Check Point Harmony."
"Among the features that I would have liked to see in its beginnings and in use of the solution is the ability to integrate real-time analysis and emulation of the activities that a user has when being attacked."
"Cloud security could add more advanced features for apps and services."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"The user interface could definitely use some improvement."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"The product needs to improve tech support."
"IBM MaaS360 can improve the location reporter. There is a 15-minute delay and this does not allow for any usefulness."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."
"An area for improvement would be handshaking with Microsoft in terms of trying to get a DLP on Microsoft OS."
More Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Data Protection with 4 reviews while IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews. Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] is rated 8.6, while IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] writes "Secure, great value, and compatible with iOS and Android". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". Check Point Capsule Software [EOL] is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, whereas IBM MaaS360 is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl and IBM MobileFirst.
We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.