Compare Check Point CloudGuard Network vs. H3C SecPath Firewalls

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls. Updated: February 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.""The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market.""We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement.""Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs.""I bought a license for three years and it was really affordable.""With AnyConnect, it depends on your license. It depends on the number of concurrent users you want to connect.""This solution might be expensive, but it is economical in the long run.""Some of our customers would be more likely to standardize on Cisco equipment if the cost was lower because a lot of people install cheap equipment."

More Cisco ASA Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

"On average, it is normally on the lower end, being less expensive than Palo Alto or Cisco.""It is more expensive than other solutions and would be more competetive in the market if it came down in price.""We pay approximately ‎€150,000 ($166,000 USD) per year.""Licensing is simply by the number of hosts that you are looking to protect within your environment. It makes it much easier to ensure that you are covering your environment.""There is flexibility in the different licensing models that are offered.""The pricing is pretty high, not just for your capital, for what you have to pay upfront, but for what you pay for your annual software renewals as well, compared to a lot of other vendors. Check Point is near the top, as far as how much it's going to cost you.""Pricing of CloudGuard is pretty fair when you have a single account. It's comparable with other cloud providers. But for our use case, it got really pricey when we had to deploy multiple CloudGuards on multiple accounts in different regions, because you can't have CloudGuard protecting multiple regions. That's the big thing.""The pricing and licensing have been good. We just had to do a license increase for our portion of it. We had that done within a couple of days. Given the fact that it's purely a software-based license, it ends up being even quicker than doing it for an on-prem firewall."

More Check Point CloudGuard Network Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  When you compare these firewalls you can identify them with different features, advantages, practices and… more »
Top Answer: They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home… more »
Top Answer: In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Firewall, Cisco ASA NGFW, Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls, Cisco ASAv
CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point vSEC, CloudGuard IaaS, Check Point Virtual Systems, Check Point CloudGuard Network Security
H3C SecPath, H3C SecPath F Series, SecPath F Series, H3C SecPath M Series, SecPath M Series
Learn More
H3C
Video Not Available
Overview

Cisco ASA firewalls deliver enterprise-class firewall functionality with highly scalable and flexible VPN capabilities to meet diverse needs, from small/branch offices to high performance data centers and service providers. Available in a wide range of models, Cisco ASA can be deployed as a physical or virtual appliance. Flexible VPN capabilities include support for remote access, site-to-site, and clientless VPN. Also, select appliances support clustering for increased performance, VPN load balancing to optimize available resources, advanced high availability configurations, and more.

Cisco ASAv is the virtualized version of the Cisco ASA firewall. Widely deployed in leading private and public clouds, Cisco ASAv is ideal for remote worker and multi-tenant environments. The solution scales up/down to meet performance requirements and high availability provides resilience. Also, Cisco ASAv can deliver micro-segmentation to protect east-west network traffic.

Cisco firewalls provide consistent security policies, enforcement, and protection across all your environments. Unified management for Cisco ASA and FTD/NGFW physical and virtual firewalls is delivered by Cisco Defense Orchestrator (CDO), with cloud logging also available. And with Cisco SecureX included with every Cisco firewall, you gain a cloud-native platform experience that enables greater simplicity, visibility, and efficiency.

Learn more about Cisco’s firewall solutions, including virtual appliances for public and private cloud.

Check Point CloudGuard provides unified cloud native security for all your assets and workloads, giving you the confidence to automate security, prevent threats, and manage posture – everywhere – across your multi-cloud environment.

H3C SecPath F5000 series is the new-generation high-performance firewalls for large-scale enterprise campus networks, service providers, and data centers.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA Firewall
Learn more about Check Point CloudGuard Network
Learn more about H3C SecPath Firewalls
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.
Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, Helvetica Insurance
Tiantan Hospital, Haier
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company10%
Computer Software Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company22%
Media Company4%
Government4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company17%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Government11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company27%
Media Company4%
Government4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business41%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise32%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise61%
Large Enterprise27%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Netgate, Cisco and others in Firewalls. Updated: February 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Check Point CloudGuard Network is ranked unranked in Firewalls with 22 reviews while H3C SecPath Firewalls is ranked 44th in Firewalls. Check Point CloudGuard Network is rated 8.4, while H3C SecPath Firewalls is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Network writes "Unified Security Management has enabled us to combine our on-prem appliances and cloud environments". On the other hand, Check Point CloudGuard Network is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and pfSense, whereas H3C SecPath Firewalls is most compared with .

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.