We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Netskope based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Gives us centralized firewall management for both Windows and Linux distros. Also provides a clear view of the security configurations and connections across environments (DMZ, external and internal networks)."
"The CloudGuard for Cloud Intelligence tool has several significant features that provide security to our company."
"Helps identify and correct misconfigurations in cloud environments, ensuring that infrastructure and applications are secure and optimized."
"The ability to drill down to individual hosts on an account and see which ones are affected is valuable."
"The initial setup is easy and not complex at all."
"It provides critical insights that enable the IT team to plan and launch smart investigations when there are security breaches."
"Its monitoring and alerts are triggered by a failure or non-compliance with policies. It helps us to be able to act effectively and quickly."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"Technical support is pretty good."
"Their technical support is very good."
"In Azure, we have multiple subscriptions and with every subscription, we add some kind of instance ID. We can work with the instance ID so that we allow all of the instances containing nodules. Everything else, we block. This way, if you go to outlook.com and check your email, if you log in with your company account, the instance ID will show. The network will take action according to the instance ID and say, "You are using the enterprise email. I'll let you surf. I'll let you see your email." But when you try to log in with your own email address, like Hotmail or Gmail, the instance ID will be different. This way we are not completely blocking Outlook, but we are blocking people from accessing their Outlook. We are only allowing the enterprise-level emails, and we are not allowing user-based emails."
"It's one of the top-ranking solutions in the market, and it's very responsive. We are using Netskope, and Netskope provides a load of features for SQL, STP, and traffic control."
"Its deployment is very easy and quick. Their technical support is also very good."
"The feature that I like best is the GUI."
"They are very good at CASB as compared to other players."
"It's a comprehensive security portfolio solution."
"I am not a technical person, but generically, the user interface can be a little more intuitive. Our staff has trained network security and cloud security professionals, and they get it, but when you are trying to get to the customers to be able to pick it up and maintain it, it can be a bit difficult."
"Streamlining the user interface would greatly improve the user experience."
"The entire system is complicated, and the setup process may not cater to the company's demands."
"I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes."
"They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."
"We were demotivated by the lack of native automation modules for the Terraform and Ansible tools."
"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."
"The security of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could improve. There are always new security issues coming out."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It should have user behavior analysis and diverse analysis."
"Support services could definitely be improved. Support is the one area that can always use improvement. It's an evolving thing, so based on demand and based on market requirement and the way market is moving towards."
"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"There should be some granular custom roles that are not available. However, this is on the road map. There are many devices that do not have the Zero Trust feature and other enhancements available which they should have."
"Third party integration with other cloud applications could be improved. Sometimes the API won't be working, but Netskope is taking it seriously. They accept all the feature requests, and they are trying to provide whatever we ask from them."
"Netskope needs to improve its stability."
"There could be better integration with other solutions."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 60 reviews while Netskope is ranked 4th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 35 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Netskope is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope writes "Network proxy that provides visibility during deployment and allows you to control PII". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Netskope is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Cisco Umbrella and Skyhigh Security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
