We performed a comparison between Aqua Security Platform and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Aqua Security Platform is highly regarded for its effective protection against container vulnerabilities and malware detection. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels in API-based integration, data leak prevention, and monitoring. Aqua Security Platform has room for improvement in areas such as log forwarding, reporting, integration, and resource consumption. Users say Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration could enhance integration with different platforms and add more collaborative features.
Service and Support: Most users say that Aqua Security Platform's customer service is generally prompt and satisfactory, although some users have had to troubleshoot problems on their own. Some users said Check Point support is quick and dependable, others have reported slow responses and requested support in other languages.
Ease of Deployment: Some Aqua Security Platform users considered the setup to be straightforward, but others encountered difficulties. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration users reported no problems with the deployment.
Pricing: Aqua Security Platform is moderately priced compared to other options. Reviewers also said Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is affordable, and there are no additional charges for essential components. Users liked Check Points streamlined renewal and licensing process.
ROI: Aqua Security Platform lacks user feedback and ROI information. Conversely, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration has consistently demonstrated a favorable ROI, with reported enhancements ranging from 15% to 80%.
Comparison Results: Aqua Security Platform is preferred over Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities, such as vulnerability checking, malware detection, container security, on-demand patching, and sandboxing. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and strong runtime security. Aqua Security Platform is seen as competitively priced, unlike Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration which is considered expensive.
"The most valuable feature is the security."
"Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment."
"The most valuable feature of Aqua Security is the scanner."
"Aqua Security helps us to check the vulnerability of image assurance and check for malware."
"The DTA, which stands for Dynamic Threat Analysis, allows me to analyze Docker images in a sandbox environment before deployment, helping me anticipate risks."
"Their sandboxing service is also really good."
"From what I understand, the initial setup is simple."
"The solution was very user-friendly."
"For Threat Prevention, I was impressed with this feature and the solution's effectiveness. It has been very good."
"It is fast and quite effective in terms of preventing any security incidents."
"It provides visibility of events, what's going on with the environment, what we're missing with our other solution, and the user behavior."
"The anti-phishing feature is the solution's best feature."
"We have managed to have an impressive reduction in phishing that used to enter our system before applying Check Point."
"It is very intuitive. It is a point and click type of deal."
"The setup is very easy. I haven't faced any complexity with the setup of the solution."
"It is fast and has a very simple, easy integration."
"Since we are working from home, we would like to have the proper training for Aqua."
"Aqua Security lacks a lot in reporting."
"The integrations on CICD could be improved. If Aqua had more plugins or container images to integrate and automate more easily on CICD, it would be better."
"We would like to see an improvement in the overview visibility that this solution offers."
"It's a bit hard to use the user roles. That was a bit confusing."
"They want to release improvements to their product to work with other servers because now there are more focused on the Kubernetes environment. They need to improve the normal servers. I would like to have more options."
"Aqua Security could provide more open documentation so that their learning resources can be more easily accessed and searched through online. Right now, a lot of the documentation is closed and not available to the public."
"The user interface could be improved, especially in terms of organization and clarity."
"We have used technical support, but their response time is very slow. It needs to be improved."
"They could improve Check Point support response times. Sometimes it takes days to resolve or even days to get a first response."
"Cloud Guard would be a complete solution if Check Point added a comprehensive data loss solution that included capabilities such as bulk data transfer detection."
"It would be nice to see them expand their collaboration capabilities to include other suites and integrate with lesser-known products."
"Although it has good characteristics, it should improve the graphical interface and the latency that it sometimes presents."
"Some files are not scanned thoroughly due to occasional network failures."
"Check Point Infinity Portal sometimes feels a bit slow, and there are performance issues that should be easy to fix."
"From time to time, the system's administrators notice the increase in the false-positive alerts being reported by CloudGuard SaaS."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aqua Cloud Security Platform is ranked 11th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 16 reviews while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 8th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 47 reviews. Aqua Cloud Security Platform is rated 8.0, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aqua Cloud Security Platform writes "A robust and cost-effective solution, excelling in scalability, on-premises support, and responsive technical support, making it well-suited for enterprises navigating stringent regulatory environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Aqua Cloud Security Platform is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Snyk, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and SUSE NeuVector, whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email. See our Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.