We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is notable for its extensive data protection, incident identification, and adaptable rule sets. It provides control over IAM roles, training options, and robust reporting. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels at API-driven integration and advanced prevention of data leaks. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could enhance its reporting, vulnerability assessments, integration, and customizability. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration requires improvements in integration, performance, and collaboration capabilities.
Service and Support: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has been praised for its helpful support. Some Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration customers were dissatisfied with response times and requested support in more languages, but others said the support was excellent.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and painless, and the overall deployment varies. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration has an automated setup that requires minimal user intervention.
Pricing: Some users found Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management to be reasonably priced and compatible, while others perceive it as costly. Reviewers had mostly good things to say about the cost of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users describe the licensing as uncomplicated and budget-friendly.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers benefits in terms of compliance management and decreased administrative workload. One user reported a 35% return on investment (ROI) and a notable growth rate. Reviewers also said that Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration consistently delivers a solid return. Users reported estimated ROIs ranging from 15% to 80%.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is preferred over Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users appreciate CloudGuard's comprehensive data security and protection for the entire cloud infrastructure. It offers strong incident detection, granular reporting, and the ability to customize rulesets based on compliance requirements. CloudGuard provides IAM role control and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. Users find the dashboard intuitive, reporting powerful, and the product's ability to enhance security and resolve incidents impressive.
"Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console."
"It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
"It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP's initial configuration is very easy. It is plug-and-play. It also gives regular updates."
"The most valuable feature is the CloudBots for auto-remediation of security findings."
"This product provides a really nice visualization of the infrastructure, including network topology, firewalls, etc."
"The ability to drill down to individual hosts on an account and see which ones are affected is valuable."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"As with most of the other Check Point products, the CloudGuard SaaS has the advanced visibility of the events and alerts."
"Its total protection has been the greatest aspect since it completely protects all the mail from the cloud."
"The anti-phishing feature is the solution's best feature."
"The solution helps to block spam emails."
"The solution has a very effective anti-phishing algorithm that detects a significantly higher number of phishing emails compared to the default Microsoft solution."
"The setup is very easy. I haven't faced any complexity with the setup of the solution."
"The first most remarkable thing is the integration with the Office 365 solution, which is easy, fast, and totally transparent for the user."
"Machine Learning and AI for email security have helped all the organization's members to guard their information against insecure exposure."
"The tool has a lot of potential, but today, it lacks a lot of Scripts/Bots for Azure."
"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."
"The product must provide different features like antivirus."
"The technical support could be better, but I do not know of any other needed improvements."
"I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level."
"Dome9 should also support deployments that are on-premises and in a hybrid cloud."
"Integration could be improved."
"The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."
"We understand that false positives are always there, but sometimes the notifications are more than expected."
"From time to time, the system's administrators notice the increase in the false-positive alerts being reported by CloudGuard SaaS."
"After updates, the internet connection fails, and I have to restart my desktop to resume initial functionalities."
"The business team should be further expanded, and more peer feedback should be made available publicly to have better and complete visibility of the application globally."
"The NAVEX metrics that I have been using on the CloudGuard dashboard cannot be exported. If they were to add report exporting capabilities on each of metric objects on the dashboard, that would be awesome."
"A phishing simulator would be helpful as a user training module."
"They should consider a module that allows the customizing of reports so we can generate executive information for the client (to explain in simple language the general security situation in the SaaS environment)."
"The solution fails to support hybrid deployments."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 56 reviews while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 9th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 47 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Wiz and Qualys VMDR, whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration report.
See our list of best CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) vendors.
We monitor all CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.