We performed a comparison between Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, IBM, MetricStream and others in IT Governance."It has very specific features which allow us to generate or see recommendations."
"The tool has very good characteristics that can help us evaluate an entire infrastructure and get the most out of it."
"It has the best workload management features."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"The product is very flexible."
"The solution has helped our organization manage our internal and external activities."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"Solution is scalable."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"The solution should be easier to use when it comes to entering and configuring with the internal applications."
"They could add real-time monitoring to improve the visibility of the entire infrastructure and improve the product a little more in terms of cloud integration."
"Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"GUI could be improved."
"The technology's a little outdated."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"The design and advanced workflow need to be improved."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
Earn 20 points
Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Governance with 2 reviews while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Governance with 38 reviews. Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] is rated 6.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] writes "Great for compliance with good reporting and reliability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Check Point easy2Comply [EOL] is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best IT Governance vendors.
We monitor all IT Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.