We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Ivanti Tunnel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Access is browser-based only and requires no additional client installation."
"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"The VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your online traffic and it essentially ensures that your fingerprints cannot be traced on the Internet."
"We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
"Organizations that already use the Check Point NGFW Solution do not require any additional hardware, which makes the implementation straightforward and reduces the time to go live."
"The technical support team provides good services and faster response times."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"Sometimes it causes the consumption of machine resources, and also improves the scanning since they consume many resources in the clients' machines."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"You have no ability to reserve a total number of licenses. The VPN user licenses are assigned per gateway, and if you enable MEP function is not so easy to size the gateway licenses."
"A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme."
"The product's interface needs improvement."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews while Ivanti Tunnel is ranked 18th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Ivanti Tunnel is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Tunnel writes "Provides efficient data security and good technical support services ". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Ivanti Tunnel is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and OpenVPN Access Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.