Compare Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN

Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is ranked 5th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews while OpenVPN is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 8 reviews. Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is rated 9.0, while OpenVPN is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN writes "Simple management, quick search capabilities, and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenVPN writes "My solution for connecting two DRBD farms". Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas OpenVPN is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks , Sangfor EasyConnect and F5 BIG-IP. See our Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints.The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature.

Read more »

The features I have found to be most valuable are the levels of encryption I can enact and the compression I can apply to improve throughput.Provided the easiest UX for our end-users and had the greatest interoperability with all the operating systems we used, including but not limited to: iOS, Android, OS X, Windows, and Linux.The compatibility with almost any Linux operating system, and how easy it is to write scripts and generate keys for people to use and log in. I found it easy to deploy quickly.A valuable feature for us is its ability to see the new Citrix server as a local server within the company. And it allows us to test abroad.It can securely do remote product updates... just as if it was on our LAN.You can do local subnet blocking.Provides privacy and cryptography for my network communication.It allows our employees to work remotely across Mac, Windows, and Linux platforms.

Read more »

Cons
I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not.The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified.

Read more »

If there was a Graphical User Interface to help streamline the configuration, I believe OpenVPN would probably venture more into the non-geek realm as it were.The upgrade path from older versions was more difficult than we wanted to tackle, so we ran an older version of the software for longer than I wanted. Patching, updating, and migrating to newer versions was a problem for us. That said, we were on a rather old version that I inherited yet it worked rock solid.If someone's key is not working, or if we had to remove someone's permission from it, or maybe an employee left the company and we had to take their key out, that seemed a little bit more complicated than it had to be.I think right now the GUI part of it is locked out behind the pay wall. It could use something that gives it a very basic, minimal, graphic interface for logging in, for the community version. That would probably be a good step forward.If we had to create something for someone who was not necessarily tech savvy, I had to set that up on their computer, I had to write "read me's" and other things so that they could install their client and then connect to the VPN by themselves. So it was hard to set up for people who are not tech savvy.I would like to see a simpler interface, so that we can make the connection between the local network using the LAN IP.I would be more happy with the idea of licensing to have a reduced price with longer, grouped, annual fees. We have a lot of other software that does the same thing. It's a little higher price if you're going with a shorter stint, but there's a reduction in price for three- and five-year contracts.They may have this already, but it would be nice to be able to get more notifications if a site drops unexpectedly.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
With regard to setup cost, pricing and/or licensing, the simple answer is that you'll need to set aside some time to learn it and experiment with it.At one point I had to purchase addition connection licenses. I was very pleased with the pricing and licensing; so much easier than navigating the confusing jungle of Microsoft and Cisco licensing and pricing. That alone made the product a delight to manage.Begin with the community version and upgrade to paid one if the need arises.The product's pricing is good value, definitely. It is one of the best features, I would say. Evaluate the product before seeing which type of licensing is good for you. I think there is a good evaluation method available for OpenVPN, so you can just evaluate if it meets your needs. Then go forward with the right licensing policy.I would say the product's pricing is a good value. I would recommend to other companies to implement it. I've seen other software, in tandem with the service, to be very expensive.The Pro Edition has a reasonable price per user.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,179
Comparisons
949
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
409
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
4,712
Comparisons
3,857
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
544
Avg. Rating
9.1
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Learn
Check Point
OpenVPN
Video Not Available
Overview

The Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN Software Blade provides users with secure, seamless access to corporate networks and resources when traveling or working remotely. Privacy and integrity of sensitive information is ensured through multi-factor authentication, endpoint system compliance scanning and encryption of all transmitted data.

OpenVPN is an open-source software application that implements virtual private network techniques for creating secure point-to-point or site-to-site connections in routed or bridged configurations and remote access facilities.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Learn more about OpenVPN
Sample Customers
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company11%
K 12 Educational Company Or School6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.