Compare Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. Pulse Client

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Pulse Client? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."

More Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Our users find the interface very comfortable to use.
Top Answer: There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features.
Top Answer: In our current dynamic, we are using this solution to provide access to data and some business applications over the internet.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,337
Comparisons
1,808
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
862
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
32
Comparisons
25
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Check Point
Pulse Secure
Video Not Available
Overview

The Check Point Remote Access VPN Software Blade provides users with secure, seamless access to corporate networks and resources when traveling or working remotely. Privacy and integrity of sensitive information is ensured through multi-factor authentication, endpoint system compliance scanning and encryption of all transmitted data.

Pulse Policy Secure is a Network Access Control (NAC) solution that provides Zero Trust Network Access Control for all managed, unknown or IoT devices in the network. It enforces foundational security policies, provides complete visibility, and is simple to use and deploy.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Learn more about Pulse Client
Sample Customers
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,718 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 5 reviews while Pulse Client is ranked 36th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is rated 9.0, while Pulse Client is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN writes "Allows everyone to work from home, which is mission-critical for our organization". On the other hand, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Pulse Client is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.