We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management."
"The security of the solution is a good feature, the stability is a valuable feature, and the customization is also a nice feature."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"A single login based on a second authentication factor is giving us the possibility of integrating third-party services for authentication based on a security scheme."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
"It keeps us safe when browsing the internet and when sharing confidential information with our colleagues."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN is a stable solution."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The provisioning of VPN users has room for improvement."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified."
"They could add more features, like the security to block off the doors, or create another hatch, something like this. They could make the features safer, add malware to make my mail and the Kryon system safer and to protect data at an earlier stage."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN could be more user-friendly."
"We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."
"The authentication that we handle is through a .p12 certificate, however, we have integrated it with a 2MFA service through another provider. Something that could improve Check Point is if it had its own 2MFA service through a blade or some sort of application."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Private Access, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.