Compare Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN vs. Sangfor SSL VPN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Sangfor SSL VPN? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature.""The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints.""Our users find the interface very comfortable to use.""It allows everyone to work from home. If no one could work from home, then we wouldn't have a company, especially now during COVID-19. It's mission-critical, especially since it's currently being used. If there is a problem with it, we would really be screwed. We would be hard-pressed because we would have to figure out what solution we're going to go with, how to deploy it, how long it would take to deploy it, and how we'd even get it on people's computers if we couldn't VPN to them. It would be near impossible to just change to a new VPN solution right now.""The most valuable feature is the seamless access."

More Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN Pros »

"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."

More Sangfor SSL VPN Pros »

Cons
"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified.""I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not.""There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features.""When you want to deploy a new Check Point agent, it is really a pain in the butt. For example, Windows 10 now has updates almost every couple of months. It changes the versioning and things under the hood. These are things that I don't understand, because I'm not a Windows person. However, I know that the Check Point client is installed on the Windows machine, and if the Check Point client's not kept up-to-date, then it's functionality breaks. It has to be up-to-date with the Windows versions. Check Point has to update the client more often. Now, the problem is that the Check Point client is not easy to update on remote computers and it's not easy to deploy a new client.""We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP."

More Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN Cons »

"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."

More Sangfor SSL VPN Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."

More Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is good and the standard license allows for 30 users."

More Sangfor SSL VPN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Our users find the interface very comfortable to use.
Top Answer: There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features.
Top Answer: In our current dynamic, we are using this solution to provide access to data and some business applications over the internet.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,337
Comparisons
1,808
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
862
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
442
Comparisons
284
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
344
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Learn
Check Point
Sangfor
Overview

The Check Point Remote Access VPN Software Blade provides users with secure, seamless access to corporate networks and resources when traveling or working remotely. Privacy and integrity of sensitive information is ensured through multi-factor authentication, endpoint system compliance scanning and encryption of all transmitted data.

Sangfor SSL VPN provides support for remote user to access the enterprise network from anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. Remote access is provided through a Secure Socket Layer (SSL) enabled by a SSL VPN gateway. The SSL VPN gateway allows remote users to establish a secure Virtual Private Network (VPN) tunnel using a web browser. This feature provides a comprehensive solution that allows easy access to a broad range of web resources and web-enabled applications (e.g.: Easy Connect) using native HTTP over SSL (HTTPS) browser support.

Sangfor SSL VPN provides SSL VPN remote-access connectivity from almost any Internet-enabled location using a web browser or a APP that natively support SSL encryption. This feature allows your Company to extend access to its secure enterprise network to any authorized user by providing remote-access connectivity to corporate resources.

Offer
Learn more about Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Learn more about Sangfor SSL VPN
Sample Customers
Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)Investcorp, Central Bancorp, Griffiths & Armour
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 5 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is rated 9.0, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN writes "Allows everyone to work from home, which is mission-critical for our organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "Good reporting, provides several options for restricting access, and the technical support is good". Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Peplink SpeedFusion, F5 BIG-IP, SonicWall SMA, Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Pulse Connect Secure.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.