We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For a basic setup, implementation is quite easy."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"One of the most outstanding features is the ability to deliver third-party services and achieve double authenticity with integrated identities."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
"The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the ability to remote control a computer system. Overall it is a complete solution."
"The most valuable feature has been the ability to give control to others for support purposes."
"The most valuable feature is you do not need to know the Windows username and password to connect and see the staff screen."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"The document control is quite good."
"The most valuable features of I use TeamViewer are the ease of access and frequent updates."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"The quality of the call and the quality of the sharing have been excellent."
"Generally, the license is included with the Check Point gateway licensing, however, in terms of the number of users that can be activated for use, it is generally five users."
"We would like to implement HTML5 (clientless access) in the product without installing any additional software."
"Some configurations, like idle timeout (the requirement came from multiple users), are not possible to configure directly from the Check Point management server."
"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
"Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"We would like to see support for a layer seven VPN over UDP."
"The solution could be improved by enhancing the use of the mobile version to be used on phones."
"Support for mobile devices from Linux has been missing since the Native client was rolled out. This was a nice option, especially when trying to walk somebody who was struggling to understand something on their phone."
"Some of the additional features, like the meeting stuff, is making it too cluttered."
"Sometimes, the app can be a little cumbersome when accessing certain aspects of the program."
"The product can sometimes crash."
"TeamViewer is publicly available and anyone can use it. This is the reason that many organizations do not permit the use of this solution. It is not considered to be secure enough."
"We have a consultant that helps us do the virtual aspects of TeamViewer."
"They could give more information about using certain kinds of applications for secure transactions, such as secure file transfers."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 60 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 84 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online and Zoom. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.