We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and TeamViewer Pilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer, Microsoft, Citrix and others in Remote Access."Setup using the manuals was easy."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless access."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"The VPN hides your IP address and encrypts your online traffic and it essentially ensures that your fingerprints cannot be traced on the Internet."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"When you want to deploy a new Check Point agent, it is really a pain in the butt. For example, Windows 10 now has updates almost every couple of months. It changes the versioning and things under the hood. These are things that I don't understand, because I'm not a Windows person. However, I know that the Check Point client is installed on the Windows machine, and if the Check Point client's not kept up-to-date, then it's functionality breaks. It has to be up-to-date with the Windows versions. Check Point has to update the client more often. Now, the problem is that the Check Point client is not easy to update on remote computers and it's not easy to deploy a new client."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
"The cost of maintenance is high compared to most products in the market."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"The location markings can appear incorrectly."
"It's quite power-hungry and some customers complain that it drains the batteries on their smartphones very quickly."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 4th in Remote Access with 60 reviews while TeamViewer Pilot is ranked 28th in Remote Access. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while TeamViewer Pilot is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Pilot writes "Good tech support ". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas TeamViewer Pilot is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor and TeamViewer.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
