We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and McAfee Complete Data Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Encryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"It has addressed storage and data transfer demands efficiently."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."
"End-to-end encryption provides full disk encryption, ensuring that all data on the device, including the operating system."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."
"We never had any complaints about the performance of computers with this tool to be able to manage the protection of disks and drives."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"Complete Data Protection lets us define roles in our data products. It helps us identify something suspicious on the client's device."
"With proper policies and configuration, it prevents sending corporate data to both cloud storage or to flash drives and data extraction."
"With this solution, the device control is more reliable and more stable."
"The console allows us to manage not only endpoint protection, but DLP, and also integration with MVISION Cloud."
"The beauty of McAfee is that they are not looking at encryption from one single standpoint. It is a broader solution."
"I don't need to have any interaction with this product, which means that it is very, very good, and it is doing its job."
"The solution is excellent for protecting users from data being exploited. It's also great for preventing data leakage."
"Reporting and encryption are its most valuable features."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"The encryption is fast; however, when it comes to generating decryption of the OS disks, it is sometimes very slow, generating a loss of time."
"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"We encountered several problems with the solution's stability."
"The refresh feature needs improvement. You need to refresh it manually yt going to the address bar, clicking on it and pressing enter, or pressing F5. There should be a button you can click on to refresh or have it so every five seconds it's refreshing."
"There was an option for SQL setup in the older versions of this product and it has been removed, but we would like to see it made available as an add-on."
"There are some features that do not work with Mac."
"Though there may be some ransomware detection modules now in McAfee Complete Data Protection, it's a field that McAfee should focus on, particularly having integration with some EDR or other add-ons. This is so McAfee Complete Data Protection would have more accuracy in detecting new ransomware in the market. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is for its pricing to be more cost-effective because some competitors have cheaper pricing, so McAfee Complete Data Protection can't compete. Sometimes, some new vendors offer other solutions rather than McAfee Complete Data Protection, to win customers over, and this is a loss for McAfee."
"I would like to have an easier and less-hassle upgrade process in future releases of the software, and extra license renewal price discounts too."
"In terms of where the solution could improve, it could integrate with network solutions for ADTs, email web gateways and discovery."
"Some clients still receive spam and malware in their attachments, so the data protection isn't working correctly. We have configured it and enabled the features in the client's system, but some policies have failed to work once or twice."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
More McAfee Complete Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while McAfee Complete Data Protection is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Encryption with 30 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while McAfee Complete Data Protection is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Complete Data Protection writes "Bandwidth is reduced and online protection does a good job of identifying traits". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas McAfee Complete Data Protection is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, Cisco Secure Endpoint, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Sophos SafeGuard. See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. McAfee Complete Data Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
